- 45
- 54
We love animals, but tough decisions like this happen all the time on a farm. Sadly, we just had to put down 3 horses a few weeks ago that had been in our family for 25 years.
— Kristi Noem (@KristiNoem) April 26, 2024
If you want more real, honest, and politically INcorrect stories that’ll have the media gasping,… pic.twitter.com/bKhpUkchHV
I grew up on a farm but luckily it wasn't Kristi Noem's farm or otherwise I'd be dead in a gravel pit.
I'm not making this up when I say she brought a happy tail wagging 14-month-old puppy to a gravel pit and then murdered it in cold blood and threw it into a shallow grave rather than find it a new home. Everything I just said is true and something she admitted to thinking she would get votes.
She literally wrote this into a book and it's not the only animal she murdered in the story lmao
This is the puppy btw:
- TrappyKong : Honestly? Would.
- 149
- 116
@Poj took this before leaving for chad in the uk !friendsofpizzashill !incels !truecels
- CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM : Hey can you buy me an unban award please I love Linux and html or whatever
- 72
- 174
- FoidBlaster : rightoid "humor"
- 76
- 101
ah yess freedom is measured by laws on your sexuality🤡having laws on your sexuality&having to show it off is whats actually oppressive💀.No one care about your sexuality. Just keep it private cause its intimate. u can be gay just dont start being a sponsor n a woke preacher.
— Hamza (@Hamzah96AJ) April 26, 2024
This may have been too far lol
Screenshots of the entire thread in case I get ban hammered
- 40
- 84
- 86
- 67
To fully grasp the current situation in San Francisco, where venture capitalists are trying to take control of City Hall, you must listen to Balaji Srinivasan. Before you do, steel yourself for what's to come: A normal person could easily mistake his rambling train wrecks of thought for a crackpot's ravings, but influential Silicon Valley billionaires regard him as a genius.
“Balaji has the highest rate of output per minute of good new ideas of anybody I've ever met,” wrote Marc Andreessen, co-founder of the V.C. firm Andreessen-Horowitz, in a blurb for Balaji's 2022 book, The Network State: How to Start a New Country. The book outlines a plan for tech plutocrats to exit democracy and establish new sovereign territories. I mentioned Balaji's ideas in two previous stories about Network State–related efforts in California—a proposed tech colony called California Forever and the tech-funded campaign to capture San Francisco's government.
Balaji, a 43-year-old Long Island native who goes by his first name, has a solid Valley pedigree: He earned multiple degrees from Stanford University, founded multiple startups, became a partner at Andreessen-Horowitz and then served as chief technology officer at Coinbase. He is also the leader of a cultish and increasingly strident neo-reactionary tech political movement that sees American democracy as an enemy. In 2013, a New York Times story headlined “Silicon Valley Roused by Secession Call” described a speech in which he “told a group of young entrepreneurs that the United States had become ‘the Microsoft of nations': outdated and obsolescent.”
“The speech won roars from the audience at Y Combinator, a leading start-up incubator,” reported the Times. Balaji paints a bleak picture of a dystopian future in a U.S. in chaos and decline, but his prophecies sometimes fall short. Last year, he lost $1 million in a public bet after wrongly predicting a massive surge in the price of Bitcoin.
Still, his appetite for autocracy is bottomless. Last October, Balaji hosted the first-ever Network State Conference. Garry Tan—the current Y Combinator CEO who's attempting to spearhead a political takeover of San Francisco—participated in an interview with Balaji and cast the effort as part of the Network State movement. Tan, who made headlines in January after tweeting “die slow motherlovers” at local progressive politicians, frames his campaign as an experiment in “moderate” politics. But in a podcast interview one month before the conference, Balaji laid out a more disturbing and extreme vision.
“What I'm really calling for is something like tech Zionism,” he said, after comparing his movement to those started by the biblical Abraham, Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith (founder of Mormonism), Theodor Herzl (“spiritual father” of the state of Israel), and Lee Kuan Yew (former authoritarian ruler of Singapore). Balaji then revealed his shocking ideas for a tech-governed city where citizens loyal to tech companies would form a new political tribe clad in gray t-shirts. “And if you see another Gray on the street … you do the nod,” he said, during a four-hour talk on the Moment of Zen podcast. “You're a fellow Gray.”
The Grays' shirts would feature “Bitcoin or Elon or other kinds of logos … Y Combinator is a good one for the city of San Francisco in particular.” Grays would also receive special ID cards providing access to exclusive, Gray-controlled sectors of the city. In addition, the Grays would make an alliance with the police department, funding weekly “policeman's banquets” to win them over.
“Grays should embrace the police, okay? All-in on the police,” said Srinivasan. “What does that mean? That's, as I said, banquets. That means every policeman's son, daughter, wife, cousin, you know, sibling, whatever, should get a job at a tech company in security.”
In exchange for extra food and jobs, cops would pledge loyalty to the Grays. Srinivasan recommends asking officers a series of questions to ascertain their political leanings. For example: “Did you want to take the sign off of Elon's building?”
This refers to the August 2023 incident in which Elon Musk illegally installed a large flashing X logo atop Twitter headquarters, in violation of building safety codes. City inspectors forced him to remove it. This was the second time Musk had run afoul of the city in his desire to refurbish his headquarters: In July, police briefly halted his attempt to pry the “Twitter” signage from the building's exterior. But in Balaji's dystopia, he implies that officers loyal to the Grays would let Musk do as he pleases (democratically inclined officers, he suggests, can be paid to retire).
Simply put, there is a ton of fascist-chic cosplay involved. Once an officer joins the Grays, they get a special uniform designed by their tech overlords. The Grays will also donate heavily to police charities and “merge the Gray and police social networks.” Then, in a show of force, they'll march through the city together.
- 26
- 28
Archaeopteryxes are about the size of a blackbird and are flying creatures that are considered the evolutionary ancestor of modern birds. They have two wide wings they use to fly and glide. However, unlike modern birds, archaeopteryxes have bony tails. They have beaks with sharp teeth which they use to tear flesh, for they are carnivorous. Prey is killed using their hyperextended second toes that hold a large claw.
We're not going to be talking about this extinct species. Instead, I'll be talking about three public freakouts. Your job is to decide if it is justified or not.
Who will clean your pottys?
This is a favorite of mine. It takes place om The View during a fierce debate surrounding Trump's anti-immigrant stance. In a bid to prove Trump's racism, kelly osborne makes a racist statement herself. She asks "if you kick every latinx out of this country, then who will be cleaning your potty Donald Trump?!" Her comment immediately elicits gasps and the camera hilariously pans to one of the latinx hosts who admonishes her.
Do you think she was being racist, or was she making a good point?
father spanks children for stealing
In this video we see a father whip the shit out of his kids for stealing. This is an ineffective form of parenting. As wikipedia tells us:
It looks really sore and I'm sure those kids will never forget it. Imagine the damage that's been done between parent and child when violence is introduced.
Do you think the father did the right thing?
Look who's leaving
There's some sort of awards ceremony going on at a high school. It's clearly been going on for too long and some parents are leaving. The principle says "look who's leaving, all the black people!". This causes an uproar which then does cause all the black people to leave. In a subsequent interview, the principle blamed the ordeal on Satan.
Do you think she was making a fair observation, or was she being racist?
Conclusion
I think I got rejected by the same person twice. I'll write a long-winded post about it soon. Oh well, I think I need to learn to get over it. She doesn't have feelings for me, and that's the deal. Tune in next time when we discuss the DC Snipers.
- 37
- 95
I been waiting till I had a few of these built up to do a drop !birdposters !furries
seeing as I might become employed soon I'll no I'll never stop I'm on that grndset fr fr
posting in the marsey hole idk where else these'd go I can't post in furry bc i'm facing housing difficulties
you'll find a selection inspired by some of my favorite marseys as well as some originals
I have assimilated into the marsey artstyle
I need to do more albeit
- 22
- 37
Most Based Comments
Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘
He is definitely having s*x with these women. He's telling you otherwise so that you won't have s*x with others. (5629)
1000% (80)
Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘
I mean he is 6'3 (38)
And blue-eyed (37)
Basedness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
The open marriage fad has really gotten out of hand. (47)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
[deleted] (1718)
Biggest Lolcow: /u/Elegant-Channel351
Score: 🐮🐮🔘🔘🔘
Number of comments: 3
Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘
Minimum angriness: 😡🔘🔘🔘🔘
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
- 10
- 18
Emory's Caroline Fohlin is knocked down by the police while shouting: “I’m a professor!!” Hear the disbelief in her voice. She never expected to be treated like this by her own university for protesting Israel's slaughter.
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) April 26, 2024
But remember, democracy is on the ballot in Nov... pic.twitter.com/rDiWDlCH9e
- 20
- 36
A growing number of individuals and groups on the right are turning their back on conservatism without giving up the label. They have abandoned the three-legged stool of fiscal conservatism, traditional values, and a foreign policy approach of peace through strength. Instead,… pic.twitter.com/Ddv6i7vKxG
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) April 23, 2024
https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/1782847806090146234
A growing number of individuals and groups on the right are turning their back on conservatism without giving up the label. They have abandoned the three-legged stool of fiscal conservatism, traditional values, and a foreign policy approach of peace through strength. Instead, they want to harness the power of the federal government to punish the left and implement their preferred policy agenda. They give no credence to the guiding principles of limited government and instead are happy to use big government in order to win. I wrote about this in National Review here:
"Holy zoinks! I can't believe conservatives no longer believe in free markets and small government! When did this happen????"
https://twitter.com/russian_cosmist/status/1783536916421386515
You're a fat r-slur and addicted to losing.
https://twitter.com/Sargon_of_Akkad/status/1783545212851151323
Crushing the left and adopting a positive traditional framework of rules and norms is good, actually.
Why the frick is Sargon of Asskad talking like a soy redditor? "Ummmm being based is good, actually, sweaty."
https://twitter.com/everymanreport/status/1783082047679987980
Please keep in mind your approach failed to conserve the women's bathroom.
https://twitter.com/TheWorthyHouse/status/1783536829632811100
You make me want to puke. For thirty years I've listened to this kind of cretinous garbage. STFU.
https://twitter.com/DougSides/status/1782893688101711972
Unfortunately you are not a conservative…
its so OVER for conservativecels
https://twitter.com/TrevorsCrucifix/status/1783516425480454472
Conservativism is dead. It failed to conserve. We are nationalists now. We Will build the future with the best of the past and it's traditions. Christ is King!
GET READY CUCKS. WE ARE GONNA BUILD THE FUTURE BEHIND OUR COMPUTERS. CHRIST IS KING!!!!
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1783535650861715585
This fat pig is beyond parody. He claims that if Republicans use power, then watch out! Democrats will retaliate. Hello? Where has this guy been for the last 10 years? Other than camping out at the all you can eat Chinese Buffett.
"Yes I'm a lispy male feminist lolcow....but at least im not a.....CUCKSERVATIVE!!!"
It feels like we have a rightoid struggle session every other week. We last had one over a calendar not being based and conservativepilled.
https://rdrama.net/post/232787/some-rightoid-grift-company-released-the
- 39
- 81
- 48
- 75
Choice quotes from the article itself
The “feminists are man-haters” trope is getting old.
Until recently, refuting these claims has proven difficult. After all, every feminist-hating man has an anecdotal story of “that one feminist” he knows who definitively hates men. Thankfully, contemporary research has finally given us real, irrefutable evidence that feminists do not, in fact, despise men.
Feminists Won't Coddle Men's Egos
Whereas non-feminist women are likely to excuse or ignore men's bad behavior toward women, feminist women will, more often than not, call it out. They will not pull their punches to spare men's egos. They expect much from men, and will hold them accountable to the behavior they know men are capable of.
And it appears that this is where the man-hating feminist trope has its roots.
Yes, there is ample anecdotal evidence that some feminist women hate men. Following the #MeToo movement, many feminists began actively self-identifying as misandrists (man-haters) in response to the sheer volume of abusive, dangerous men who were exposed during that time. Many feminists and non-feminists alike saw their attitudes toward men evolve as they saw prominent male celebrities, political correspondents and politicians they trusted and admired be called out for their sexual misconduct and attempted cover-ups. For a lot of us, it was a time that eroded our trust in men. For some of us, that trust was never regained.
lmao
But the existence of some feminists who hate men does not prove that all feminists hate men. In fact, although feminism is a movement that seeks to center women's equality and liberation, it has also done much for the liberation of men. After all, men are harmed by patriarchy, too, and feminists seek to abolish all forms of gender-based discrimination that are propped up by patriarchy.
lol
Now we get into the comments
Moid does everything to please feminists but only gets shit on, continues being a feminist because it's called being a decent person chud.
I mean, to say that feminism hates men is nonsensical because feminism is a broad and diverse ideology that itself can neither hate nor love.
I've done everything that my feminist gender studies professors told me to do as a man. I am gentle, communicate my emotions, try not to be arrogant and speak over people, etc etc etc, and I am a better, more fulfilled man for it.
But... once in awhile I'd like my side to actually advocate for me, and recognize that we still live in a society that excludes men from many things. I'd like my side to recognize that sometimes WOMEN unfairly exclude and hurt men. The advice everyone gave me as a man and as a father, including the school principal and family lawyer? Get a female family member to take my kids to the doctor, because if it had been a woman doing it, this probably wouldn't have happened.
This was extremely depressing for me. Despite being the best man and father and husband I could--- and live up to the feminist ideal of what a man should be--- I was still treated like a predator and abuser by default. So who was advocating for me as a man on this issue? Who was calling this out and calling it unfair??
The only voices I hear are right wing ones, but I am not interested in being the kind of man they want me to be.
Let's be honest... if I went to a feminist sub on Reddit and brought up my woes, would people in that sub be sympathetic? Or would I promptly get banned?
Other men like you are supposed to be advocating for it. But men have been so reliant upon other people, usually women, organizing and structuring neutral gatherings and a lot of existing men's spaces being incredibly toxic means men have to start creating their own communities.
Only right wingers are dishonest and the reason why young people support palestine is because zoomers can just fact check who is more just on the internet
Something I've noticed over the decades is that conservatives tend to think that everyone knows and believes what they know and believe. Therefore, in their mind, anyone who professes to know/believe something different is just lying in order to gain an advantage over the conservative.
Which fits this situation. Since they believe feminist beliefs are wrong and trying to assert power over men, they hate feminists and assume feminists must hate them just as much (if not more). They cannot imagine a world where people just ... believe differently, everyone must be trying to pull a fast one on them.
I mean, that's what THEY do. Conservatives lie all the time about everything, so they assume everyone else does too.
I'm good
They're bad
If I do something bad, they must be doing the same thing, but even worse.
I think the reason this tends to be more prevalent on the right is that they believe in good and bad people, while the left tends to believe in good and bad actions.
Hot take. The rise of leftist thinking among the youth populations is directly correlated to how much easier it has become to actually check whether actions have good and bad consequences. Boomers cannot imagine being able to just gather data on what is and is not helpful for people and society. They favor divine command ethics and virtue ethics because these are much easier to use in low-information ecosystems.
Menslibber calls out the phd article writer for purposely misinterpreting a study
She also links to another article she wrote about the same topic, which interprets the lower benevolence result as:
Meaning, feminists are less likely to coddle, mollify, or excuse men who behave poorly.
These interpretations do not seem to have any basis in the actual study. If you read the study that she cites, the scores for benevolence are measures of benevolent sexism specifically, taken from the 1999 AMI inventory, which measures responses to statements like “Every woman needs a male partner who will cherish her” and “Men are more willing to take risks than women.” A footnote in the study explains, "Conceptually benevolence to men and hostility to men are not indices of positivity–negativity, but rather they measure stereotyped attitudes to men."
In other words, she is citing a study that found lower benevolence and then is explaining what lower benevolence means, but her explanations are baseless and not supported by the actual study. It is ironic that she is even trying to (baselessly) defend feminists' lower benevolence, because this finding actually signifies that feminists have less stereotyped attitudes towards men.
Menslibber used to be a chud but then he realized that feminists couldn't be misandrists because feminists believe in equality... just like how the DPRK is a true democracy
I used to be skeptical of feminists as well, when I was a teen. I thought many of them were just misandrists. Then I was reminded of the word "misandrist" and realized that was stupid - feminists believe in equality, misandrists "hate men."
Can someone who calls themselves a "feminist" act misandrist, or even be a misandrist? Sure. But they are different things, so that's important to know.
Menslibber volunteers for charity and notices how it somehow turned around to being about women
I volunteered for a men's charity for a while that said it was about challenging what it means to be a man, but all they really did was challenge how being a man affects women, they did talks like "here's how to talk to your friends about sexism and consent" which is very valuable, but when that's ALL hat you do I can understand why some men feel like it paints them as the problem.
Every single press snippet on their website was about the safety of women (which is incredibly important). But when your challenging masculinity charity is more only focused on demonising the behaviour of men towards women, it's like putting a plaster over a wound that needs stitches. It would be more fruitful to help them to understand themselves and express themselves in a healthy way that sends a message that these men are valued as people.
Can you understand why women and feminists main priority may be lowering the rates of sexual violence? And they do that by teaching about consent? I do not understand how you can experience a talk about consent as demonizing men
Menslibber says its only moid foid on social media
This is especially clear on social media spaces like Instagram where men LOVE complaining about women and seem to just genuinely hate women that aren't super submissive "trad-wives"
Menslibber/vaush fan explains that it doesn't make sense for men to ignore what women's expectations for dating purposes because another menslibber told them to, gets btfoed by a janny
One of the most demoralizing things I sometimes read on this subreddit is someone saying that men can't change because women still have expectations of them that fit traditional gender roles.
How true that perception of expectations are is pointless to argue because it differs from place to place and most people talk about their personal experiences anyway... but even if it was 100% true, always - so what? If it's a necessary step for the better, don't play into those expectations. Women don't want to date you because of that? Okay.
"but even if it was 100% true, always - so what? If it's a necessary step for the better, don't play into those expectations. Women don't want to date you because of that? Okay. "
I dont know man.This just feels like a bad concession .Part of appealing to a demographic means addressing issues that said demograpic actually cares about.For alot of guys,especially young guys,thats dating.How to be percieved as attactive to women around me.
Its counter productive and a bit delusional to expect men to ingore what the women they actually come across becasuse some online social tell them so. (entire comment removed)
FOH with that.
Finally we have the removed comments
https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l194lda/#comment-info
Other men like you are supposed to be advocating for it. But men have been so reliant upon other people, usually women, organizing and structuring neutral gatherings and a lot of existing men's spaces being incredibly toxic means men have to start creating their own communities.
Men have organized movements for millenia, how could you possibly suggest that they simply are too lazy to organize? Men organize on this issue all the time on the right. So why not on the left? Because it is a hostile workplace environment, as evidenced by the very comments you made up above.
I know, because I've tried and I've experienced the phenomenon myself. I have attempted to organize, and I have been met with hostility from people that should be allies. For example: when my wife and I dealt with infertility, I was involved in numerous infertility support groups and ran my own. There were no men, and I wondered why. So I started a subgroup myself and encouraged the women to bring their husbands so that we could get things going.
In doing this, I realized I'd revealed my gender, and I was verbally abused by many of the women there. A few were right winger Bible thumper types who thought I wasn't adhering to God's plan of what a husband/father to be, but even more were self identifying feminists who said I was "invading the sacred space of women" and "just trying to get off on pregnant women." I would have perhaps started an exclusive men's group, but it would have taken years and years to get it up and running and I needed support at that moment, not in 10 years. It's hard to get a men's liberation movement going when the people who are supposed to be your allies are actively tearing you down. The attitude was generally. Their attitude was the same as yours: "You are wrong for expressing your pain when so many others are suffering more."
I had the same issue as a parent of a micro preemie. At the moment of my deepest depression and grief when I needed support, I went to pre-existing support groups. I was met with the same treatment. So I started my own blog and tried to organize. While working. While raising a kid with special needs. But yeah, I get it, I'm a man so I just have to do it all myself with no help, and if I fail, it's all on me.
Do you know how hard it is to try to create a movement from scratch in a busy life? It's like telling a woman in the 19th century to--- if she wanted to be a scientist--- simply to reinvent the entire university system and scientific literature system from scratch.
And yeah, it's nice that you can find a few people in the halls of academia who might actually be earnest advocates, but that doesn't mean much when the actual people in the real world who are supposed to be allies are tearing you down.
Your lecturing me without knowing my experiences is a bit hypocritical when you talk about being patronizing. You think you are the only man who has experienced that kind of pain with a loved one and struggled in a typically non-male space?
I appreciate and commiserate with your story and I am well aware of how hard it is for men to organize these kinds of groups. Yet feminists had to do it in much harsher conditions in the late 19th century to now. Again - those men didn't join the one you tried to create because to a lot of men, it isn't our responsibility. I don't see how your story contradicts my overview. I know a few good men are trying.
It's just the majority of men benefit from our patriarchal society or just don't care.
foid try to not make anything about themselves challenge impossible
https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l18csfk/#comment-info
It's a lot easier to justify oppressing people who you can convince yourself you hate - and it's easier to hate someone who you can convince yourself hates you.
And unfortunately the whole conservative movement & mediaaphere is a giant machine for manufacturing hate. Hence why, and how, patriarchy gets reproduced.
Do you have any evidence that this is what anti-feminist men are trying to do? It's a common trope, but I only ever see it bandied around in feminist spaces.
When I myself was antifeminist, and when I talked to other antifeminists, our antifeminism was not about trying to justify oppressing women. Rather, it was about trying to stop stereotyping and prejudice towards men. So it is quite ironic that you describe antifeminism as an attempt to justify the oppression of women.
They regularly believe women's place is in the kitchen; that men are physically and mentally superior to women; that men deserve a well-mannered, subservient wife; that female promiscuity is a problem, and that reproductive health should be out of their control; that no-fault divorce shouldn't exist and marital rape is impossible; that sexual harassment and assault isn't a widespread issue;
islam is right about women
https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l19b8lf/#comment-info
The real perception paradox: reading an article about men who hate feminists that makes feminist men question their stance. /s
Seriously though, there is something very wrong with the tone of the article.
The "all men are responsible for patriarchy" trope is getting old.
https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1ccxkhm/_/l18vo21/#comment-info
Mods, are y'all going too hard on some of the comments? There was one that I wanted to respond to that's now deleted, and the person said they were once antifeminist but now they weren't. These are people who have learned that what they thought was wrong, and grew from it. Or they're explaining how they came to believe what they did believe. These things can and should absolutely be included in discourse about those who aren't feminist. Who knows what would work better to change someone than someone who has changed?
- 6
- 10
Todyay the red dyot kyame byack. I thyought I had kyaught it this tiyme, but somehyow it slipped out of my paws 3 tyimes. On the lyast tyime my paw knyocked over the watyer bowl. Now I am thyirsty and there is nyothing to dryink. I hyate fridyays.
- 29
- 38
Most Based Comments
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘
That has never ever been stated. Genjutsu works on ANYONE. Even itachi and sasuke. It's a matter of SKILL in genjutsu that determines if you're not affected by one. Not by just having a dojutsu. It's why Danzo can still gett affected even though he has shishui's eyes. Why sasuke and itachi can still affect each other with genjutsu as well, even though they will quickly see through it.Izanami doesn't need help from another person. What are you talking about?Bro there's so much wrong in your post, I don't know where to start. (1)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘
Wtf are you on. The whole shinden shows how itachi played obito.And please tell me how obito wasnt threatened when flowing teen itachi after getting dewth threats or admitted in his inner monologue he would die. No the closest was when a kid threatened him and followed his ultimatum while admittong he cant kill him and if he would even find out he isnt madara and thete isnt w secret about his " immortality " he would.be dead already lmaoAnd again kishimoto himself stated itachi is the strongest in akatsuki in thr authors note.Itachi >teen itachi >/= om obitoCanon shinden, manga facts and atate dby KISHIMOTO himself.You , nah bro its not true, source: trust my headcanon Obito snd madara fanboys are thr most delusional clowns. You literally atgue against a clear statement by kishimoto himself lmao (3)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔘🔘🔘
Pain wins in any case:Genjutsus dont work on painAmaterasu has counters from 2 of 6 pains, and they can help the rest.Itachi has not large amounts of chakra and cant mantain susanoo for long.Izanami needs help from another person so he cant do it.Pain can always use chibaku tensei and thats a KO for itachi. (4)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Not a single person in Naruto fights to lose. Except maybe hiding, cause that's also his wincon. (-1)
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
I literally just linked you the manga scans of it growing to protect against attacks. In the manga Itachi doesn't move in any capacity. He just slices the hydra. You are watching the anime, which isn't canon. Go look at the thread I just linked and get back to me (0)
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Biggest Lolcow: /u/hi-polymer5
Score: 🐮🐮🐮🔘🔘
Number of comments: 6
Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
Maximum angriness: 😡😡🔘🔘🔘
Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
- 83
- 44
@pizzashill, you are welcome. @Poj, please forgive him. You guys are like my adoptive rDrama parents, I can't handle another divorce.
Edit: Computer, enhance:
@D do you feel like an r-slur yet?
Edit 2: For you illiterate r-slurs, pizza makes around 210k a year
How many of you wagies are pulling that?
- 12
- 45
- 29
- 51
German police forbid ‘speaking Irish' at Berlin protest — Free Speech Dispatch April 2024
police dispersed the event of “about 40 Irish people living in the German capital, under rules that only allow English and German, and in some cases Arabic, to be used during protests.” One protester, who accused police of also cracking down on protests in Arabic, said police were “worried that we, in Irish, would say something that glorified terrorism or incited violence” and, because they did not provide an interpreter, “were banned from speaking in Irish.”
Paradox of Tolerance, sweaty
Mick Sneed:
Disgusting.
Not only are the Germans subjugating the langauges of the smaller, peripheral Nations (yet again), but they are simultaneously re-affirming their position as a Vassal State of the American/ Anglo-Saxon Empire.
Refusing Autonomy for themselves, and for everybody else in the EU.
Germans are based! And American-Anglo Saxon Empire sounds cool!
Absolutely, the people need the platform that best suits their ability to express themselves, once it is peaceful, what can be the hard? Must be lobbied law?, possibly by the likes of the Israeli's. I was on an occupation in London that was linked to the Hambacher occupation in Germany, and folks went between both, never heard of that. Suppose if you consider some of the control measures, this is probably not surprising, yet I am surprised. What if a load of Slovaks want to peacefully protest, and they dont speak good German/English, then they will have a problem expressing themselves fully. It dosnt make sense, thanks again for spreading the word. 1 extra educated chap here!
Idk, maybe protest in your own shithole country?
(-4) Irish people should not be supporting Islamists.
Additional Sneed:
They've been problems in Deutschland for a while:
https://old.reddit.com/r/ireland/comments/uu92ca/irish_in_germany/?sort=controversial
Well, there are several organisations which try to bring matters to the German courts, and there are groups of journ*lists writing about the issues, and things like that. There are actually some really good Israeli activists here trying to change German minds.
Things that are unconstitutional, like declaring BDS antisemitic or banning demonstrations that would normally be covered under "free speech".
Ah, I see. That makes more sense but I don't understand why it would be the duty of foreigners to do this.
Why shouldn't foreigners being involved in the country they live in?
(-14) Because they're guests.
Winning hearts and minds!
- 24
- 48
Ted, 62, Austin TX
Career/Personal
Retail Manager
$21 an hour, at least 40 hours a week
time and a half overtime
Around $3000 a month
No benefits, he's on his wife's
Wife makes around $3500 a month
"retail management is not my endgame"
Spent 14 years working for Texas "Commission on State Emergency Communications"
- Got a Master's degree because of this?
Went to Art school at some point
Went through a bankruptcy 6 years ago
- All of this debt has accrued since bankrupcy
Wife has probably the same number of credit cards timestamp
He has $17'000 saved for retirement
Financials
"Why is there so little invested?" timestamp
- Boomer ramblings and deflection
Self-scored - 5/10 timestamp
150k or so left on his mortgage
Credit Card 1 (CreditOne) ($811) timestamp
$20 in new purchases, $20 in interest
Paid $75 on this
Minimum payment 30
Why Spend on his card?
- "Our expenses are higher than our income"
Credit Card 2 (Apple) (2115) timestamp
Minimum payment 67
$41 in interest accrued
Puts his life insurance payments on his card?
Credit Card 3 (Discover) ($4196) timestamp
$69.50 in new purchases
Made a $100 payment, also made $100 purchase?
Minimum payment $84
$57 in interest
Lots of mobile games micro-transactions on this card (company called "Zynga")
- "I was able to quit smoking, and drinking, but I can't quit this"
Credit Card 4 (eBay) ($1'487) timestamp
Made a $75 payment
Minimum payment of $30
Credit Card 5 (Lowes) ($535) timestamp
Made $50 in payments
$12 in interest accrued
$30 minimum
Credit Card 6 (JC Penny) ($1'591) timestamp
Made 75 in payments
$40 in interest charged
$57 minimum payment
Credit Card 7 (Venmo) ($753) timestamp
$30 minimum payment
$102 in new purchases, made $30 in payments
$15 in interest
Eating out and microtransactions on this card
Credit Card 8 (Walgreens) ($441) timestamp
"I think that's the one that started it all, they had this display when you walk into the store"
$29 minimum payment
$12 in interest
Credit Card 9 (Verizon) ($1'290) timestamp
He wanted to take advantage of the discount on the phone bill using the card to pay for it
$48 Minimum payment
$34 interest accrued
Made a $100 payment
Credit Card 10 (Upgrade) ($1'272) timestamp
- $72 minimum monthly payment
Credit Card 11 (Upgrade) ($9'260) timestamp
Thinks he has two Upgrades because traveling?
$126 interest accrued
$474 minimum monthly payment
"Uhhh I I uh I run a non-profit"
"Some of these now that I think about it might have been expenses"
"Performing Arts Venue" - He's the president (doesn't get paid)
Credit Card 12 (Sitco) ($378) timestamp
$29 minimum payment
$10 in interest
Credit Card 13 (Chevron) ($128) timestamp
$29 minimum payment
$71 in purchases
50 in payments
$2 in interest accrued
More mobile payments on this one
Playing "Empires and Puzzles" and a couple others
Credit Card 14 (Ally) ($228) timestamp
- $28 balance
Credit Card 15 (Amazon) ($580) timestamp
$29 minimum payment
$14 interest
$50 payment made
Credit Card 16 (At Home) ($45) timestamp
- "Why wouldn't you just pay off $45?!"
Credit Card 17 (Alta) ($0) timestamp
Synchrony ($656) timestamp
$30 minimum payment
Made a $50 payment
Made $12 in purchases
- It was Starbucks
$14 in interest accrued
Credit Card 18 (didn't catch name) ($28) timestamp
28 minimum payment
70 cents in interest
Credit Card 19 (NFL) ($1'474) timestamp
$39 in interest charged
Made $43 in purchases
$54 minimum payment
More in-app purchases
Credit Card 20 (MGM) ($242) timestamp
"We went to Vegas"
$5 interest accrued
Student Loans ($229'000) timestamp
he's in forbearance, doesn't know why, Caleb can't figure out why
7.6% interest, 17'000 a year in interest if they ever start back up
"Yeah, I'll never pay that off"
- "You're right"
"That servicing company is under investigation or something, it's in the news"
"Well it doesn't matter much I'll be dead before that's paid off... so I don't even consider that a debt"
Mortgage ($122'205)
3.8%
$1'268 monthly payment
Synchrony Bank is where most of his cards are from timestamp
Car
Doesn't have one, wife has a car, not paid for, newish because of a car accident that wrecked their old one
Used to have two
Both worked at home but he got laid off then when to retail
Checking Account timestamp
3'240 + 8'111 - 10'094 -> 1'259
Lots of eating out
A $100 Verizon payment here, not using the Verizon card since it's maxed out ]
More microtransactions
"That's how I pay my daughter, we give her money to help her live" timestamp
She's finishing up her undergrad
Boomer gets testy when question about this
Wife debts itemized timestamp
- Not even going to try writing these out, 28 different ones
$906 in interest is accruing a month (not counting Student Loans)
Should he consider bankruptcy? timestamp
- Total $379'000 ($122k of that is the mortgage), includes the student loans
Income/Spending Pie Chart timestamp
- 34
- 59
This happened because Ben Gvir is an untouchable narcissist
— SDL (@SocDoneLeft) April 26, 2024
He has forced his drivers to speed & run red lights for YEARS, and cops won't ticket him https://t.co/bNhmjEkUrd pic.twitter.com/lvUTAJsI0y
!palestine !jidf thoughts?
- 32
- 56
Outside of the sub echochambers, the normal consensus appears to be that the show vastly failed to capture any of the magic or uniqueness of the books.
"I don't agree with this person about this particular show, but there isn't anything inherently wrong with being easily entertained. What a weird choice of insult."
WRONG WROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG!!!
Respecting people who has the objective bad opinion about media is allowing Foids to ruin your stuff and hobbies!!!!!!!!!!!11111
Cucksoy tries to support his opinion with RIGHT-think reviews!