- 158
- 364
STUNNING BRAVE QUEEN AND CONTRAPOINTS SKINWALKER MAKES AN HOUR LONG VIDEO CENTERING AROUND @Landlord_Messiah's BAIT ACCOUNT. 1.3 MILLION LIBTARDS WATCH... NONE OF THEM KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!
LANDLORD_MESSIAH IS MESSIAH
source:
https://rdrama.net/post/231171/posted-this-ironically-and-people-fell
- 63
- 92
Here's a Eurobeat song about Marsey trolling on the internet
Here's some folk songs about !jinxthinkers
- 7
- 19
I want to gauge exactly how many people understand what’s really going on with this headline. pic.twitter.com/rzoLwkWQAh
— ZeeeMediaOfficial (@zeee_media) March 25, 2024
non-r-slurred people commentary:
- 65
- 131
You kílled your dog on purpose?!?
— The Homocracy (@ReasonPete) March 27, 2024
Lmao he saw my reply and must have been pissed
I'm currently the top response (viewed with an alt that doesn't follow my main)
50 raging replies and counting:
- 41
- 30
BLM protesters at Western Kentucky University show up to the building where Kyle Rittenhouse will be making an appearance.@FrontlinesTPUSA@TPUSA pic.twitter.com/kFJAstG1Ea
— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) March 27, 2024
- 109
- 109
- 53
- 53
how is it that the First Asian Bachelorette only has 1 East Asian guy and 1 South Asian Indian guy casted on her season? How is this championing Asian representation? I know I've said in the past that imagine Rachel Lindsay as first Black Bachelorette ever and only having 1 Black man on her season? Or Matt James only having 1 back woman on his season? It's unjustified.
But those who know, know it might not be a casting problem. Her ex jokingly called her out last month on TikTok for "having a type":
https://tiktok.com/@themattyrossi/video/7340127002910887210
Anyway, here are the men:
https://tiktok.com/@oliviaschueller/video/7350628435988942126
The commenters on tiktok are not impressed:
Lack of Asian dudes aside, most of the fellas look pretty normal to me.
In other words, it never even began if you're a guy and look worse than any of these dudes.
https://twitter.com/nancywyuen/status/1772786146101342421
lmao
- 3
- 6
Nicktoons USA schedule for 3/25 - 3/31, 2024
— HyperSchedules (@HyperSchedules) March 25, 2024
EDT, subject to change/error.
The schedule scales back to just 3 shows for spring break. pic.twitter.com/PZxGBl0TBL
@A why cant the gen chat orgy schedule look like this
- 16
- 47
Most Based Comments
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
I'm going with NAH bordering on TA.She knew she definitely didn't want a baby. You're in the comments understandably upset about it but showing some opinions that definitely are indicating you would've found some way to convince her to keep it.Edit: I would fully change it to TA based off of speaking to OP in the replies to this comment. (1056)
I absolutely would have convinced her, that would be my CHILD. (-3157)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
And if she does not want that child and it destroys her mental health being guilt tripped into having it; Would the child be worth it still? (1750)
Yes, absolutely. (-2447)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
You've been with this woman a few years. Had you ever discussed an accidental pregnancy with her? (5297)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Since you come from a family of Alabama dumbfricks maybe you should pause and think before saying someone else said something dumb since you are clearly a dumbfrick too.Did I say there is no difference at all? No I said they aren't different with regards to the fact that you should tell your partner of years before doing them. That's it. Clearly they are different in various other ways.I'm going to reject your framing of the two situations. Not everyone that gets an abortion has the same thought process you pointed out and going on vacation for a month can make someone happy for a lifetime. Your framing is disingenuous, but expected for an Alabama dumbfrick.Here is a fact: if you have a partner of years and are willing to have s*x with them and risk getting pregnant you SHOULD tell them if you are going to get an abortion. That is a huge life decision that impacts both people and when you are in a serious, committed relationship for years you talk about those things beforehand. Maybe n... (-1)
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Biggest Lolcow: /u/TexanAmericanMexican
Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🔘
Number of comments: 10
Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
- 86
- 174
This is the anti-White communist FILTH defending the Zionist conservative media now.
— MIA (@_Mama_Mia10) March 27, 2024
They’ve finally come together for a common cause — hating White Christians.
I always knew that they were two sides of the same coin, but now the world sees it. https://t.co/98WFfkkWLt
She deleted but here's some more threads
https://twitter.com/ReasonPete/status/1772966278606573961
https://twitter.com/ReasonPete/status/1772984617412202989
https://twitter.com/sjretar/status/1772973146804502641
This guy is totally not seething you guys
Screenshot of original post
Right after this exchange is when she deleted and blocked me lmao
Total homo victory
- 17
- 17
why do we need Asian ?
it's called exploring other cultures
Asians don't celebrate Easter
I am saying this with as much love as I can … (essay of sneed)
- 1
- 3
- of_blood_and_salt : hama-who
- J : Groomercord nonsense
- CuteTank : rule 34
- 64
- 137
Destiny (a woman's name) subreddit is having fun
https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1bp2786/its_almost_like/?sort=controversial
Some wojaks for future use
WRONG THINK ALERT https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1bp2786/its_almost_like/kwsu4e7/?context=8&sort=controversial
Thread is still fresh!!
A DEFENDER APPEARS
- Soren : you are spending your final days thinking about this?
- 51
- 70
- 3
- 6
I turned 40 this year. I'm still a virgin. I'm literally a virgin who can't drive. 🤷🏽♀️
I'm a 33 yr old virgin who can't drive!
At 33 and a virgin and lazy and picky is such a good way to describe it. There's other factors too but lazy is such a big one. Lol
It's literally L after L
- 11
- 20
I really feel sick over how our broken society is going to handle 2/3 more years of AI improvements
Yep, as everyone knows internet boycotts always have excellent results.
TOTAL POORCEL DEATH
Funny how the creatives thought they'd be safe from AI, instead they're first on the chopping block. Learn to dig a ditch, sweaty.
Just total all over the comments.
Mamma Mia star Sara Poyzer is replaced by AI for BBC production as she calls the shock decision 'sobering' and 'grim times' for the industry
She has dominated the West End for her performance as a lead actress in Mamma Mia for over ten years.
But after decades of performances, shows and gigs, the BBC have decided a robot can do her job better after replacing actress Sara Poyzer with Artificial Intelligence.
Ms Poyzer, who has toured the world playing Donna Sheridan in the Mamma Mia musical for 11 years, has had a successful career as an actress and voiceover artist.
Most recently starring in Olivier award winning West End show Come From Away, she has been employed by the BBC for at least 20 years working on hit shows Doctors, EastEnders and The Archers.
But yesterday she received an email from the corporation telling her she was no longer needed for a role.
Posting a screenshot on her Twitter and Instagram, the email read: 'Sorry for the delay – we have had the approval from the BBC to use the AI generated voice so we won't need Sara anymore.'
Tagging the BBC and trade union Equity, Ms Poyzer captioned the photo 'sobering…' with a sad face emoji.
The Mail has learnt that the email was a response from a production company that was working with the BBC on a project hoping to hire Ms Poyzer.
Ms Poyzer was waiting to hear back on whether it had been confirmed but was told they would be using AI instead.
She commented on her post saying that the industry was in 'grim times'.
She was flooded with support in the comments with many industry professionals saying the same thing had happened to them too recently.
'It's happened with myself and art projects many times now, sorry this has happened to you,' one person said.
Another commented: 'Happening to all our industries. It's killing all our jobs. I saw an entire set which was AI the other day.'
'This is awful and so heartlessly put,' another said.
Equity, the performing arts workers union, launched 'Stop AI Stealing The Show' in 2022- a campaign around performers' rights over Artificial Intelligence.
The BBC covered and backed the campaign heavily discussing it on the likes of Front Row and BBC News.
This week the BBC vowed to stop using AI to promote Doctor Who after receiving complaints from viewers.
Voice Squad, a voiceover agency that works with Ms Poyzer said: 'We were very disappointed to receive the production company's response, particularly as it's a BBC project.
'The BBC have always stood for quality in their factual and drama broadcasting. As a voiceover agency we feel that AI is a danger to the whole industry – removing work from artists who have trained for three years at drama-school and spent many years honing their craft.
'Voice artists are particularly skilled actors who deserve not to have their work devalued.'
The BBC was contacted for comment, while Ms Poyzer declined to comment.
- 35
- 61
Context : An indie horror film came out recently. This indie horror film used AI to generate some posters that appear in the background of a scene. This was apparently an experiment by the art team for the film. This is also, literally a hecking genocide.
This "review" was posted to /r/moviescirclejerk to make fun of the author. As is natural for a circlejerk sub, people take it seriously and get mad about AI art instead of laughing at the r-slur.
Ya, can't make any concessions on AI. If people use the “oh it's such a small part of the film” or “so many other people worked on it and it'd be a shame to not give them their due just cause there are small uses of AI”…those arguments are how studios will justify using AI more and more until it becomes so normalized that a significant number of careers are eliminated and impacted just to save some money and strip the humanity from the art form.
EDIT: just want to clarify i think review bombing is dumb in this case and just not seeing it is the way to go
You'll have to boycott Dune Part 2 as well, because they used AI to track the eyes for shots where they're tinted blue.
I personally think that use is fine and perfectly ethical because it removes tedium from the artists' workload, but if you're going to toe the absolutist line of “can't make any concessions” then you can't make exceptions.
Ai guided art is not the same thing as ai generated art, this movie did not use what you are describing
I'm aware. I'm also against the use of AI-art that replaces human-created content, but that's not what the above comment stated.
"Ya, can't make any concessions on AI." That's a pretty black-and-white, absolutist argument against the use of it in any form. I would like to learn more about its potential as a tool to help alleviate the artist workload, but that's sadly not the conversation anyone wants to have.
I can't believe they didn't clarify every possible way you could willfully misinterpret and extrapolate what they were saying
Not only is the AI art less than 1% of the runtime of the movie, it's also not critical to the movie at all. By review bombing the movie I think you're devaluing the efforts of the actual humans and could potentially hurt their careers by trying to sabotage something they worked on.
So I agree with the sentiment but don't think this is the right way to get your message out. Maybe I'm bias because I loved the movie tho
Their "careers" are supposed to exist cause their skills are needed and valued, not out of charity - otherwise might as well just shed the pretense and put them on UBI (which I support).
My dude, if you're on the side of computers rather than humans then I don't even know what to say.
My dude you're on the side of computers
The reviewer mentions that they're a struggling artist and the fact that they scraped money to see this film only for them to show reminders that their work will be underappreciated and replaced with automated art in the future. Was it worth pooping and cumming over? Not necessarily, but it paints a grim image for artists, even ones who are really successful and can easily make a living out of it. Apart from that, the reviewer said that the film is "very witty and funny" but feels tainted by these out-of-place elements that further remind the audience that the future of art will be recycled and derivative of pre-existing pieces. Users on X, formerly known as Twitter, have argued that boycotting the film simply because of AI art is a spit in the face towards everyone else who worked on this film, which sort of makes it a lose-lose for both sides.
AI-generated pieces are very new and a little uncanny as well, and despite the uses of it in "Late Night with the Devil" and "Secret Invasion", I really hope this doesn't become the norm, and the anger is justified.
they're a struggling artis
not my fault they picked a stupid career
How were their livelihoods devalued?
People like you existed when digital art came to prominence , and 30 years later you and your cool little Reddit avi are unharmed and art isn't dead .
Not the same thing. Art is about human expression, AI isn't human. Typing in a prompt is not art.
There's a lot of good seethe in this one
Great job OP. Next up, post a review about somebody complaining about legitimate racism in a film and call them a crybaby.
Being pro-Ai is the same as being racist, you chud
Also, I took these screenshots last year and haven't had an opportunity to post them. Enjoy some bonus content !kino
- 89
- 107
Think about what I’m doing. I am copying and pasting studies that the taxpayer has funded - with a little commentary. Then look at the vitriol. It’s not normal.
— Charlotte Gill (@CharlotteCGill) March 27, 2024
Twitter academics say these studies are *actually* brilliant. But are also apoplectic that they’ve been shared.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773012132356878836
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772974254998323372
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773016275775525172
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773011217797271963
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772999912537383344
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772961478678589694
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772917017055482299
"Academic" leeches respond:
https://twitter.com/greg_jenner/status/1772579856439452068
https://twitter.com/DrMabel_Winter/status/1772662746535887269
https://twitter.com/rosa_v_campbell/status/1772728325296771509
https://twitter.com/drrachelbroady/status/1772989436302700630
- 62
- 103
t. /u/David_DH, a Redditor since 2016 who posts exclusively in videogame subs and subs for toys.
t. /u/Vo_Mimbre 23k redditor over 3 years. Posts in videogame subs and /r/marvelstudios.
Uhh yeah, capitalism breeds narcissists.
You pretty have to have zero to no empathy to be successful in today's economy
t. /u/clearcontroller, redditor since 2011. Posts in videogame subs, /r/antiwork, and /r/tinder.
Maybe we as a society should rethink what personality traits we are incentivizing
t. /u/Loud-Ad-2280, the op and proud owner of a 200k, 3 year old Reddit account. Posts in /r/PoliticalHumor and /r/Leopardsatemyface!
And replying to that...
Thank you, /u/HobbieK, for taking time out of your busy schedule of running a 9 year old Reddit account, posting in /r/Helldivers, /r/Starwarsbattlefront, and /r/letterboxd. Be sure to bring this epic pwnage up at your next /r/DSA groomercord meeting!