None
364
:siren: PHILOSOPHYTUBE FELL FOR THE ANTIWUCOALITION :siren: 1.3 MILLION :marseysamhyde: LIBTARDS BAITED :marseybait: :wolfrofl: LARGEST SINGLE :marseywall: MISINFORMATION :marseydeception: SPREAD :marseymisinformation: IN RDRAMA :marseyhammerpizza: HISTORY?!?!?! :marseyscream:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115041813186603.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115041814931788.webp

STUNNING BRAVE QUEEN :marseycard: AND CONTRAPOINTS SKINWALKER MAKES AN HOUR LONG VIDEO :marseyzeldalinknes: CENTERING AROUND @Landlord_Messiah's BAIT ACCOUNT. 1.3 MILLION :marseysamhyde2: LIBTARDS WATCH... NONE OF THEM KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

:#chudjakdancing:

:worship: LANDLORD_MESSIAH IS MESSIAH :!worship:

:#chudjakdancing:

source:

https://rdrama.net/post/231171/posted-this-ironically-and-people-fell

None

Here's a Eurobeat song about Marsey trolling on the internet

Here's some folk songs about !jinxthinkers

None

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17116113364756513.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711611335692171.webp

non-r-slurred people commentary:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17116113359401205.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17116113362204046.webp

None
131
Catturd seethes and blocks me after I expose his dirty secret

Lmao he saw my reply and must have been pissed

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115866726531155.webp

I'm currently the top response (viewed with an alt that doesn't follow my main)

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115882601766245.webp

50 raging replies and counting:

https://twitter.com/ReasonPete/status/1773146177703170453

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115866712507677.webp

None

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17116065466443439.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711606547272794.webp

None
None
6
Sunflower-chan

https://twitter.com/Peargor/status/1772971650532696360

None

how is it that the First Asian Bachelorette only has 1 East Asian guy and 1 South Asian Indian guy casted on her season? How is this championing Asian representation? I know I've said in the past that imagine Rachel Lindsay as first Black Bachelorette ever and only having 1 Black man on her season? Or Matt James only having 1 back woman on his season? It's unjustified.

:marseyclueless:

But those who know, know it might not be a casting problem. Her ex jokingly called her out last month on TikTok for "having a type":

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115938269479127.webp

https://tiktok.com/@themattyrossi/video/7340127002910887210

Anyway, here are the men:

https://tiktok.com/@oliviaschueller/video/7350628435988942126

The commenters on tiktok are not impressed:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115938260816586.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115938263342936.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115938265018716.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115938266699293.webp

Lack of Asian dudes aside, most of the fellas look pretty normal to me.

In other words, it never even began if you're a guy and look worse than any of these dudes.

!tmz

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115942067652102.webp

https://twitter.com/nancywyuen/status/1772786146101342421

lmao

None
6
SPONGECHADS WE ARE SO BACK

@A why cant the gen chat orgy schedule look like this

None

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

I'm going with NAH bordering on TA.She knew she definitely didn't want a baby. You're in the comments understandably upset about it but showing some opinions that definitely are indicating you would've found some way to convince her to keep it.Edit: I would fully change it to TA based off of speaking to OP in the replies to this comment. (1056)

I absolutely would have convinced her, that would be my CHILD. (-3157)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

And if she does not want that child and it destroys her mental health being guilt tripped into having it; Would the child be worth it still? (1750)

Yes, absolutely. (-2447)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

You've been with this woman a few years. Had you ever discussed an accidental pregnancy with her? (5297)

We had discussed it before. I told her that I would want the baby no matter what, and she “agreed”, but clearly did not really feel that way. (-1286)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Since you come from a family of Alabama dumbfricks maybe you should pause and think before saying someone else said something dumb since you are clearly a dumbfrick too.Did I say there is no difference at all? No I said they aren't different with regards to the fact that you should tell your partner of years before doing them. That's it. Clearly they are different in various other ways.I'm going to reject your framing of the two situations. Not everyone that gets an abortion has the same thought process you pointed out and going on vacation for a month can make someone happy for a lifetime. Your framing is disingenuous, but expected for an Alabama dumbfrick.Here is a fact: if you have a partner of years and are willing to have s*x with them and risk getting pregnant you SHOULD tell them if you are going to get an abortion. That is a huge life decision that impacts both people and when you are in a serious, committed relationship for years you talk about those things beforehand. Maybe n... (-1)

Bro, you can try to insult me about having dumbass Alabama family, but you ain't gonna my feelings about it. I was the one that called them dumbasses in the first place and I do it ALL THE TIME, plus I'm the one that stopped talking to them as soon as I was able to think past my nose. I'll even give ya more ammo, to try and shoot at me, if you like: I'm Alabama white trash and Mexican, and both sides of my family are the reason southerners and Mexicans have negative stereotypes associated with them, and I mean ALL the negative stereotypes both demographics have. My family makes whole swaths of the country look bad, much less little ole me. My genetics are garbage and while I love my mom, she had NO fckng business passing on the crap lineage she OR my dad had. Both people should never have procreated at all, much less with each other. If you really want to get into it, my genetics are SO BAD that my uterus tried to kill me several times before I was finally able to convince board cer... (1)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

You people (OP) are the people I stay away from on Reddit. The Reddit comments you made in this thread not only show that you're an butthole, but also a malcontent, control freak, greedy, a complete piece of shit, and a man that not even the most piece of shit women out there would want to date. Being pro life is one thing. Being brazen enough to try to control a separate person because you wanted a kid is miles worse than the pro life ideology. You sir don't have any control over your girlfriend and the audacity to try to be this patriarchal cancer makes everyone hate your guts here.Go frick yourself because that's the only kind of s*x you'll ever get. (4)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

I'm gonna go with NAH because you can break up for any reason, and also you can't necessarily control your emotions just because of whatever logic.However,I don't think it's really reasonable to expect her to ask your input for an abortion. Maybe this is controversial to say, but at the end of the day she's the one who'd be carrying a baby for 9 months and she's the one who's body would be damaged by pregnancy. Women still die during childbirth, it's a lot of pain, and I think it's her - and her decision alone - about whether she puts herself through that.I think if you'd believed that you were actively trying for a baby or whatever then yeah there would be that sense of betrayal. But if she knew she didn't want to go through with pregnancy at this time, then it's not really a baby that was inside of her. It was a medical problem that needed to be dealt with. And if she knew you'd have wanted to keep it or would have tried to persuade her to go through wtih pregnancy, then it could'... (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/TexanAmericanMexican

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🔘

Number of comments: 10

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

None
174
Screenshots and alt-links inside I baited a 33k follower account by telling her homos are going to put her in breeding camps

:marseyxd: :marseyxd: :marseyxd:

She deleted but here's some more threads

https://twitter.com/ReasonPete/status/1772966278606573961

https://twitter.com/ReasonPete/status/1772984617412202989

https://twitter.com/sjretar/status/1772973146804502641

This guy is totally not seething you guys

Screenshot of original post

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115497047533789.webp

Right after this exchange is when she deleted and blocked me lmao

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711549953040037.webp

Total homo victory

None

why do we need Asian ?

:boomermonster:

it's called exploring other cultures

:marseysoyseethe:

Asians don't celebrate Easter

:boomermonster:

I am saying this with as much love as I can … (essay of sneed) :marseylongpost: :soyjaktantrumfast:

None
5
borgar

https://twitter.com/GreenTanuki64/status/1773077198758424978

None
3
Spider-chan fries some rice

https://twitter.com/SpiderKaiku/status/1772771523629052193

None
Reported by:
137
The Hamasabi :marseyturkroach: meltdown :soyjihadi: continues...

Destiny (a woman's name) subreddit is having fun

:mar#seysow: :marseyre#apcrying: https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115568247236803.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711556824941029.webp

https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1bp2786/its_almost_like/?sort=controversial

!dramatards @arsey

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115568246122754.webp

Some wojaks for future use

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711556825001674.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115568250863163.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711556825199738.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115568255089338.webp :mars#eyme:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711556825623921.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115568258002229.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115568261254594.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711556826382131.webp :marseypeterso#n:

WRONG THINK ALERT :redlight: https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1bp2786/its_almost_like/kwsu4e7/?context=8&sort=controversial

Thread is still fresh!!

A DEFENDER APPEARS

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115569045437639.webp

None
Reported by:
  • Soren : you are spending your final days thinking about this?
70
MasterLawlz - if you're wondering why you were removed as a moderator of r/Drama and banned from the subreddit.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711579990651849.webp

:#marseyropeyourself:

None

I turned 40 this year. I'm still a virgin. I'm literally a virgin who can't drive. 🤷🏽‍♀️

I'm a 33 yr old virgin who can't drive!

At 33 and a virgin and lazy and picky is such a good way to describe it. There's other factors too but lazy is such a big one. Lol

It's literally L after L

None

Welp…it's starting.

I really feel sick over how our broken society is going to handle 2/3 more years of AI improvements

:marseysickos2#:

I have no interest in listening to computer generated vocals or watching AI characters acting in AI scripted programming.

Just don't watch it and openly state your opinion.
:marseychonkerfoidindignant:

Yep, as everyone knows internet boycotts always have excellent results. :derpthumbsup:

I don't think a lot of people realise how quickly AI is negating the need for entire industries. This isn't a concern for five or ten years down the line, this is happening right now, at a time when people are already struggling to balance bills.

It's terrifying.

TOTAL POORCEL DEATH :marseyrise:

I love that AI gets to make the art while most of society toils away at meaningless bullshit jobs that we hate. It's like all these technological advances are stripping away life's joys, and somehow creating more soulless pointless busywork at the same time.

Funny how the creatives thought they'd be safe from AI, instead they're first on the chopping block. :marseysmug3: Learn to dig a ditch, sweaty.

Just total :marseysneed: all over the comments.


Mamma Mia star Sara Poyzer is replaced by AI for BBC production as she calls the shock decision 'sobering' and 'grim times' for the industry

She has dominated the West End for her performance as a lead actress in Mamma Mia for over ten years.

But after decades of performances, shows and gigs, the BBC have decided a robot can do her job better after replacing actress Sara Poyzer with Artificial Intelligence.

Ms Poyzer, who has toured the world playing Donna Sheridan in the Mamma Mia musical for 11 years, has had a successful career as an actress and voiceover artist.

Most recently starring in Olivier award winning West End show Come From Away, she has been employed by the BBC for at least 20 years working on hit shows Doctors, EastEnders and The Archers.

But yesterday she received an email from the corporation telling her she was no longer needed for a role.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17116013601358807.webp

Posting a screenshot on her Twitter and Instagram, the email read: 'Sorry for the delay – we have had the approval from the BBC to use the AI generated voice so we won't need Sara anymore.'

Tagging the BBC and trade union Equity, Ms Poyzer captioned the photo 'sobering…' with a sad face emoji.

The Mail has learnt that the email was a response from a production company that was working with the BBC on a project hoping to hire Ms Poyzer.

Ms Poyzer was waiting to hear back on whether it had been confirmed but was told they would be using AI instead.

She commented on her post saying that the industry was in 'grim times'.

She was flooded with support in the comments with many industry professionals saying the same thing had happened to them too recently.

'It's happened with myself and art projects many times now, sorry this has happened to you,' one person said.

Another commented: 'Happening to all our industries. It's killing all our jobs. I saw an entire set which was AI the other day.'

'This is awful and so heartlessly put,' another said.

Equity, the performing arts workers union, launched 'Stop AI Stealing The Show' in 2022- a campaign around performers' rights over Artificial Intelligence.

The BBC covered and backed the campaign heavily discussing it on the likes of Front Row and BBC News.

This week the BBC vowed to stop using AI to promote Doctor Who after receiving complaints from viewers.

Voice Squad, a voiceover agency that works with Ms Poyzer said: 'We were very disappointed to receive the production company's response, particularly as it's a BBC project.

'The BBC have always stood for quality in their factual and drama broadcasting. As a voiceover agency we feel that AI is a danger to the whole industry – removing work from artists who have trained for three years at drama-school and spent many years honing their craft.

'Voice artists are particularly skilled actors who deserve not to have their work devalued.'

The BBC was contacted for comment, while Ms Poyzer declined to comment.

None

526 clicks and 9gb of a mod pack later :marseywave2: my wrist

None
61
I'm literally crying and pooping over an AI skeleton right now : moviescirclejerk

Context : An indie horror film came out recently. This indie horror film used AI to generate some posters that appear in the background of a scene. This was apparently an experiment by the art team for the film. This is also, literally a hecking genocide.

https://preview.redd.it/l6qqg5x76wqc1.jpeg?width=1024&auto=webp&s=8b8d09d48fe9babb71042bfa5eb0963a2a04172b

This "review" was posted to /r/moviescirclejerk to make fun of the author. As is natural for a circlejerk sub, people take it seriously and get mad about AI art instead of laughing at the r-slur.

The use of AI is fricked up, especially for indie film makers who are in the chopping block. They literally could've gotten better art for like 50 bucks. Do you want the future where "You go home and make an AI romcom with you and Marillyn Monroe" like the Russos' want? Because this is the first of many cuts.

Ya, can't make any concessions on AI. If people use the “oh it's such a small part of the film” or “so many other people worked on it and it'd be a shame to not give them their due just cause there are small uses of AI”…those arguments are how studios will justify using AI more and more until it becomes so normalized that a significant number of careers are eliminated and impacted just to save some money and strip the humanity from the art form.

EDIT: just want to clarify i think review bombing is dumb in this case and just not seeing it is the way to go

You'll have to boycott Dune Part 2 as well, because they used AI to track the eyes for shots where they're tinted blue.

I personally think that use is fine and perfectly ethical because it removes tedium from the artists' workload, but if you're going to toe the absolutist line of “can't make any concessions” then you can't make exceptions.

Ai guided art is not the same thing as ai generated art, this movie did not use what you are describing

I'm aware. I'm also against the use of AI-art that replaces human-created content, but that's not what the above comment stated.

"Ya, can't make any concessions on AI." That's a pretty black-and-white, absolutist argument against the use of it in any form. I would like to learn more about its potential as a tool to help alleviate the artist workload, but that's sadly not the conversation anyone wants to have.

I can't believe they didn't clarify every possible way you could willfully misinterpret and extrapolate what they were saying

:marseysoycry:

I understand the frustration and am also vehemently against the use of AI art but I think the review bombing specifically just because of the use of AI art is hypocritical.

Not only is the AI art less than 1% of the runtime of the movie, it's also not critical to the movie at all. By review bombing the movie I think you're devaluing the efforts of the actual humans and could potentially hurt their careers by trying to sabotage something they worked on.

So I agree with the sentiment but don't think this is the right way to get your message out. Maybe I'm bias because I loved the movie tho

Their "careers" are supposed to exist cause their skills are needed and valued, not out of charity - otherwise might as well just shed the pretense and put them on UBI (which I support).

My dude, if you're on the side of computers rather than humans then I don't even know what to say.

My dude you're on the side of computers :poonerdood: :marseyrobot:

I do think they're overreacting a little, but as someone who has read the full review, I feel obliged to talk about this. I would have cited my sources, but I'm not sure how to do that on Reddit.

The reviewer mentions that they're a struggling artist and the fact that they scraped money to see this film only for them to show reminders that their work will be underappreciated and replaced with automated art in the future. Was it worth pooping and cumming over? Not necessarily, but it paints a grim image for artists, even ones who are really successful and can easily make a living out of it. Apart from that, the reviewer said that the film is "very witty and funny" but feels tainted by these out-of-place elements that further remind the audience that the future of art will be recycled and derivative of pre-existing pieces. Users on X, formerly known as Twitter, have argued that boycotting the film simply because of AI art is a spit in the face towards everyone else who worked on this film, which sort of makes it a lose-lose for both sides.

AI-generated pieces are very new and a little uncanny as well, and despite the uses of it in "Late Night with the Devil" and "Secret Invasion", I really hope this doesn't become the norm, and the anger is justified.

they're a struggling artis

not my fault they picked a stupid career

:marseykneel:

I know this is a circlejerk but kind of fricked up to post this without the wider context of the rest of that review? this person is an artist who spent time and money to see a film whose creators actively devalue their livelihood, you can cherry pick the most dramatic part for lols but I can understand why that would be disheartening

How were their livelihoods devalued?

:marseypearlclutch:

Hot take, this isn't an overreaction at all. AI has no place in art and will be the death of it. If you can't make a movie without AI, don't make a fricking movie,

People like you existed when digital art came to prominence , and 30 years later you and your cool little Reddit avi are unharmed and art isn't dead .

Not the same thing. Art is about human expression, AI isn't human. Typing in a prompt is not art.

There's a lot of good seethe in this one

Great job OP. Next up, post a review about somebody complaining about legitimate racism in a film and call them a crybaby.

Being pro-Ai is the same as being racist, you chud :marseyblackface:

Also, I took these screenshots last year and haven't had an opportunity to post them. Enjoy some bonus content !kino

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115786123549626.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115786122296762.webp

None
77
:marseyembrace:
None
107
Based foid calls out academics sucking on the the public teat

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115557476638384.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773012132356878836

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115559010604734.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772974254998323372

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115557477854698.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773016275775525172

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711555901613166.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773011217797271963

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115559017269921.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772999912537383344

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115559018558774.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772961478678589694

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115559019739306.webp

https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772917017055482299

"Academic" leeches respond:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115560522300034.webp

https://twitter.com/greg_jenner/status/1772579856439452068

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115560524461927.webp

https://twitter.com/DrMabel_Winter/status/1772662746535887269

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711556587139617.webp

https://twitter.com/rosa_v_campbell/status/1772728325296771509

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115566735870907.webp

https://twitter.com/drrachelbroady/status/1772989436302700630

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115566736399376.webp

https://twitter.com/RonyBzh/status/1772994410382303278

None
103

That's who capitalism rewards, those who bully others.

:#marseysoycrytrembletalking:

t. /u/David_DH, a Redditor since 2016 who posts exclusively in videogame subs and subs for toys.


This is literally how global capitalism rewards behavior. It's a zero sum game where one wins because others lose, so of course the aggressor will excel.

:#marseysoyswitchtalking:

t. /u/Vo_Mimbre 23k redditor over 3 years. Posts in videogame subs and /r/marvelstudios.


Uhh yeah, capitalism breeds narcissists.

You pretty have to have zero to no empathy to be successful in today's economy

CEOs and big-wigs are usually sociopaths or psychopaths

:#soysnooseethetalking:

t. /u/clearcontroller, redditor since 2011. Posts in videogame subs, /r/antiwork, and /r/tinder.


Maybe we as a society should rethink what personality traits we are incentivizing

:#soyjakanimeglassestalking:

t. /u/Loud-Ad-2280, the op and proud owner of a 200k, 3 year old Reddit account. Posts in /r/PoliticalHumor and /r/Leopardsatemyface!

And replying to that...

Capitalism above all baybeee

:#soysnootalking:

Thank you, /u/HobbieK, for taking time out of your busy schedule of running a 9 year old Reddit account, posting in /r/Helldivers, /r/Starwarsbattlefront, and /r/letterboxd. Be sure to bring this epic pwnage up at your next /r/DSA groomercord meeting!

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.